15 Comments

1. 10:55 don't forget to check some cursed images of AI generated Pocahontas VS my version of Cyberpunk Pocahontas, in the end of the video!💀

   Reply

2. I love your art more.

   Reply

3. I've been wondering about this lately, you make very good points. Amazing work talking on the topic and creating something from scratch and showing the results against AI art at the end of the video!

   Reply

4. Awesome artwork as always.

   I feel your words and feelings are spot on.

   AI could be a great asset to many industries. But it still does a lot of silly things and requires intervention to meet non-trival tasks.

   Reply

5. What is your thoughtz on stable diffusion img2img

   Reply

6. One thing I have noticed is that thus far, AI isn't good at repeating the exact same design with small modifications. If you want the AI to simply update a design w/ minor changes, it will redo the whole thing and give you something new each time. So I believe even if AI can come up with great concepts, even in bigger companies, you will still need humans to fix and edit it, especially with how picky many clients can be, small tiny changes aren't something an AI can do. Overall, we still need humans to get exactly right the idea people are going for- AI isn't quite there, who knows if it ever will be.
   I believe AI will replace artists as much as Kindle replaced real books…. (it didn't).

   Reply

7. seems like you haven't seen the midjourney type of AI images 😀

   Reply

8. to be fair ai may be useful and useless at the same time
   feels unoriginal
   if a owner has drawing style worked hard over the years
   kentaro miura said in his interview before his death
   once you turn 20 and reach 50 will have wisdom
   the art doesnt comes from skill
   it’s all about maturity
   i was worry about all artists might lose their jobs because of ai
   except marvel and dc comics will use ai
   cuz there greedy bastards
   digital art have different people different styles
   and i like their improvement
   it’s important
   imagination comes our mind and head
   not the ai
   ai are useful for background
   or environment
   so theres nothing to worry about it
   i forgot
   kentaro miura did draw digital before his death
   he stopped drawing traditional paper and switched to digital
   his drawing has improved
   that’s why its okay to improve

   Reply

9. I don't think this whole debate should be about artists as a craftsmans or "renderers", AI inevitably will get better and things like t-shirt designs at H&M you mentioned will be done by machines, drawing realistically or aesthetically is something that AI surely will be in charge of one day, but in my opinion those skills do not define artists.
   If we venture a bit into art history we'll see that at the start of 20th century artists stopped caring about a realistic rendering of reality, art began to change towards expressionism and dadaism (an art movement that denies making any sense) and then we got Marcel Duchamp, this guy literally brought porcelain urinal to the art exibition, soo there the f i was going this this tangent? oh…. Well, i guess conceptualism is a way to go now, art is not so much about rendering, that it's about ideas, and until AI get's to the point where it can generate ideas like a human brain artists are safe.
   Getting from the fields of high matters back to earth, yeah, your points make sense, but this whole issue should be adressed a bit broadly i guess? So, some art jobs might be lost to ai, stuff like making shitty realistic portraits for examle (those are already done by hungry students) or some jobs in animation like Inbetweeners (people who draw unimportant frames between important ones), but in most other areas a living breathing human is needed to come up with the idea and think through the execution. Concept artists for video games they don't just mindlessly shit a ton of pictures, they trying to convey a bunch of things through character design, AI can't do that. On the other hand, ai could be a great tool for artists, help to speed up the process and create something they didn't have the resources to do.

   Reply

10. I love your outlook on this topic, your artwork and voice is very aspiring. Which is something Ai can't replicate ❤

    Reply

11. AI art creations are made from already existing art creations. Its based on a huge database, and the algorythms are looking to what the user is requesting. Where AI art creation will help is for conceptual designs BUT as only a tool for the conceptual designer. It will never be a finished product because it will always lack of a story. It's cold, it has no background, it's just a result of a mix of key words. So, nope, AI art won't kill digital art!! ^^

    Reply

12. 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝓂𝑜𝓈𝓂

    Reply

13. AI art is more on reference for me, and also AI can't do Layout designing

    Reply

14. i think it will replace trade artists (except artisian art communities). production artists. but not people will vision. they will adopt it to better communicate their ideas.

    Reply

15. I don't think it will be good unless it's for wallpapers or pre purchased images people want. If a client approaches the software and is like I want a female tribal warrior. The ai will deliver but it wont look good even after multiple iterations. what it is good for is inspiration, layout, and surrealism. Now imagine even after it does deliver a good tribal warrior, what if the person asks for a tweak or redesign or in different clothing. it wont ever work. I think it will be a useful tool for us not against.

    Reply